Search

Friday, April 19, 2019

Ethical and Legal Considerations in Completing the Diagnostic Assessment


By: SOPHIA F. DZIEGIELEWSKI

Professional efforts require that all activities performed and judgments made are within an Ethical and Legal framework. Practitioners must avoid any hint of malpractice. Malpractice is negligence in the exercise of ones profession.

All the legal requirements and the problems that can occur is beyond the scope of this article.  However, professionals should

(a) Be aware of the rules and requirements that govern professional practice activity in their state and

(b) Be well versed in the code of ethics that represents their professions moral consensus  (Reamer, 2001, 2009).

It is not enough for helping professionals to assume that their ethical practice will be apparent on the basis of their adherence to their professional code of ethics.

Two common sayings about documentation are:

1. If you documented it, it happened.
2. If you did not document it, it did not happen.

When documenting client information, be sure it is accurate and reflects the nature of the ethical services provided, as this can be the best way for mental health practitioners to protect against malpractice. Practitioner documents must ensure that client confidentiality and privacy are protected (Dziegielewski, 2013).

One helpful rule is to remember that at any time, all records may be subpoenaed in a court of law, where private client information may be divulged. Regardless of the employment setting, all helping professionals should consider maintaining personal malpractice insurance in addition to what may be provided through agency auspices.

Even with the best of intentions, mental health practitioners may find themselves in legal proceedings defending the content of notes, subjective assessments, or terminology used in the diagnostic assessment.

It is always best to record objective data and refrain from using subjective terminology (i.e., what you think is happening). When documenting, always use direct client statements; do not document hearsay or make interpretations based on subjective data (Dziegielewski, 2008).

Practitioners need to be familiar with specific state statutes that do not allow professionals to elicit or document specific client information. For example, mental health professionals are prohibited from documenting the medical condition of AIDS patients without client consent.

In record keeping, the ultimate legal and ethical responsibility of all written diagnostic and assessment-based notes always starts and stops with the mental health practitioner.

References

SOPHIA F. DZIEGIELEWSK, 2015, DSM-5TM in Action, by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Read Also



No comments:

Post a Comment