By: PETER STURMEY
When mental
health practitioners are faced with a new client they have to predict the best treatment for this particular person.
This is not an abstract question concerning the efficacy of treatments in general,
but a highly specific question about one particular person and his or her
unique set of circumstances right here and now.
Many mental
health practitioners answer this question by
using psychiatric diagnosis as a predictor of best treatment. But for many
reasons, mental health
practitioners often reject this approach. Rather, the clinician takes the
information he or she has concerning this specific person’s unique set of problems, assets
and circumstances, and using the clinician’s experience, knowledge of the
outcome literature, theoretical perspective creates a hypothesis or series of
hypotheses that will guide them to the most effective treatment for this
person.
Case formulation
is a commonly taught clinical skill and many clinicians use it routinely. Although there is some agreement
about the general features and common general principles that underlie case
formulation, the content of different formulations is often quite different
depending upon the theoretical orientation of the clinician. Clinicians may make
formulations from cognitive, cognitive-behavioural, behavioural, psychodynamic,
psychiatric and eclectic approaches. Even within
each of these orientations, the specific technologies and concepts used to develop a
formulation may vary considerably.
Case formulation
is a basic clinical skill for many mental health professionals. It is often included in professional training (Page
and Strizke, 2006; Page, Stritzke and McLean, 2008) and continuing education
for many mental health professionals (Kendjelic and Eells, 2007; Kuyken et al., 2005; Sim, Gwee and Bateman, 2005). Various professional bodies, such as
the British Psychological Society (British Psychological Society Division of
Clinical Psychology, 2000, 2001), the American Psychiatric Association
(2004) and the American Psychological
Association (APA) (2005), identify this as a professional competency that
practitioners should have and the professional training courses should teach. Within
cognitive-behavioural approaches to mental health, case formulation is seen as a core
skill for all practitioners.
References
Peter Sturmey,
Clinical Case Formulation; Varieties of Approaches, 2009, John Wiley Ltd.
Read Also
The Psychiatric Evaluation
Evolution of Psychiatric Diagnosis
The Clinical Interview
Diagnostic Principles
The Need For A Clear Boundary Between Assessment And Treatment
Completing the Diagnostic Assessment
The Comprehensive Diagnostic Assessment and Evaluation
Definitions of case formulationEvolution of Psychiatric Diagnosis
The Clinical Interview
Diagnostic Principles
The Need For A Clear Boundary Between Assessment And Treatment
Completing the Diagnostic Assessment
The Comprehensive Diagnostic Assessment and Evaluation
No comments:
Post a Comment