By: THEODORE MILLON
et al.
Schizotypals are
often described as odd and eccentric and seemingly engrossed in their own
world. Most researchers believe that the schizotypal personality lies on a
continuum with schizophrenia called schizotypy. Schizotypals, like
schizophrenics, experience both positive and negative symptoms. As one of the
three structurally defective
personalities (the
paranoid and the borderline are the other two), schizotypals are set
apart from other
personalities in that they rarely find a comfortable niche in society and
repeat the same setbacks
again and again. However, most schizotypals are able to pull themselves together enough to
prevent slipping into more serious decompensated states.
Despite the
severe nature of this personality disorder, there are normal variants in
society. Oldham and Morris (1995) describe the idiosyncratic style that
“marches to a different drummer” and is highly open to new experiences and
often attracted to the occult
and supernatural.
Normalizing the DSM-IV criteria also provides a more normal variant of schizotypals that draws inspiration from their own
internal world and may hold certain superstitious beliefs
but is able to suspend them to function effectively in society.
Some variations
on the schizotypal personality are proposed by Millon (1990). The insipid schizotypal exaggerates the schizoid,
passively detached pattern in addition to schizotypal features and is
likely to have had a family background of indifference and formality. The timorous
schizotypal shares the more actively detached style of the avoidant and is likely to have
been belittled and rejected while growing up.
The schizotypal
personality is a relatively new construct that has its origins in both the writings of Kraepelin and Bleuler, who studied
dementia praecox patients and noticed how diverse their symptoms were. Bleuler
conceptualized these patients on a continuum with schizophrenics at the
most severe end and with schizotypals closer to normal because they could often
appear to “walk about life” like any “normal” person. In 1956, Rado coined the term
schizotype as an abbreviation for schizophrenic phenotype. He believed that schizotypals
were not destined to decompensate into schizophrenia but could fluctuate between
compensated and decompensated states and perhaps even live a normal life. Later family and
genetic studies have supported this idea of a spectrum of schizophrenia.
The emerging viewpoint, stemming from biological research, is that schizotype is the fundamental disorder with schizophrenia being a special case and schizotypal personality being the general case. Brain studies that have been conducted with schizophrenics are currently being explored as to their applicability to schizotypal personality and to see if new light can be shed on this research with the perspective that schizotype is the fundamental disorder. This research shows a promising line of thought that involves not only brain anatomy and neurotransmitters but also neurovirology.
The emerging viewpoint, stemming from biological research, is that schizotype is the fundamental disorder with schizophrenia being a special case and schizotypal personality being the general case. Brain studies that have been conducted with schizophrenics are currently being explored as to their applicability to schizotypal personality and to see if new light can be shed on this research with the perspective that schizotype is the fundamental disorder. This research shows a promising line of thought that involves not only brain anatomy and neurotransmitters but also neurovirology.
Psychodynamic
theory would predict that schizotypals would regress to a stable, but primitive, ego state with temporary psychotic
episodes. They lack a basic integration of the self and other
object-representations; thus they are considered a structurally defective
personality. The interpersonal perspective gives another slant on the
schizotypal personality
that highlights their tendency to obscure fact from fantasy and their isolation
that prevents them from experiencing a corrective feedback. Schizotypals seem
to lack an
understanding of basic social codes and norms and often miss social cues that
cause them to
chronically misinterpret social situations. Benjamin presents a developmental
account through an interpersonal understanding that focuses on parents sending
illogical or
contradictory messages about the child’s learning to be autonomous.
Schizotypals seem
unable to organize their thoughts; this disorganization seems to be from the bottom up. A possible explanation of this
disorganization is a malfunctioning in their neural network. Schizotypals also are easily
distracted, and many develop disorders in the productivity of speech. From a
biopsychosocial perspective, the schizotypal personality lies on the
continuum between the schizoid and the avoidant and usually develops symptoms
more closely aligned with one of these disorders. As the level of
pathology increases, the
structural matrix seems to disintegrate.
The schizotypal
shares traits with not only the schizoid and avoidant but also the paranoid and
borderline personalities. They are vulnerable to developing dissociative episodes, psychotic symptoms, and depression. Therapy
is extremely difficult with the schizotypal because of their thought disorder as well
as their paranoid ideation, and success depends heavily on the severity of the
thought disturbances. Their therapeutic goals depend on whether there are
more avoidant or more schizoidal traits. Developing a strong therapeutic alliance is
critical before distortions of reality can be confronted. Cognitive
interventions must take into account schizotypals’ limited attention span as
well as address
their automatic thoughts. Overall, cognitive therapy combined with medication
will likely prove to be
the most effective treatment for the schizotypal personality.
References
Personality Disorders in Modern Life, second edition, 2000,
2004 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
No comments:
Post a Comment